Status of the Verbalish Witness Recognition to Violence Against Suspects as a Tool of Evidence

Authors

  • Faizal Rahman Malang Islamic University
  • Sunardi Sunardi Malang Islamic University
  • Hanafi Arief Kalimantan Islamic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.53

Keywords:

Verbal Witness; Confession of Violence; Suspect; Evidence

Abstract

In the examination of a criminal case trial requires several pieces of evidence as contained in the Criminal Procedure Code called KUHAP, such as: witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions, and statements of the accused. Verbalized witnesses are not included in the KUHAP, but they often occur in criminal justice practices. This study aims to find out how the position of evidence in Indonesian criminal law and how verbal witness confessions can be used as evidence of criminal acts of mistreatment of suspects. This research is descriptive in nature, with a statutory approach, primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials and qualitative analysis is carried out systematically in order to obtain answers to problems, Witness statements are legal evidence as regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning called KUHAP. A verbal witness is an investigative witness who is presented by a judge in a trial because the defendant withdraws the Minutes of Examination called BAP. The presence of this verbal witness was to prove the testimony of the defendant who said that during the investigation the defendant was under pressure or coercion.

Verbal witness statements can be used as a judge's consideration in accepting the reasons for revocation of the  BAP carried out by the defendant and the judge's considerations in making a decision. Moreover, verbal witness testimony was taken in a trial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Anshoruddin, 2004, Hukum Pembuktian Menurut Hukum Acara Islam dan Hukum Positif, cet. I Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, 2012, Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Yogyakarta: PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama

Julya Ergina Putri, “ Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Verbalisan Dalam Perkara Narkotika.

Syaiful Bakhri, 2009, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana, cet. I, Jakarta: Total Media

Legislation

Criminal Code (KUHP)

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code

Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights

Journal

Ferrel, Dinda Teza, 2017, Penggunaan Hukum Saksi Verbalisan Sebagai Alat Bukti Perkara Narkotika, Repository Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Salut Murniasih, Pembuktian Berdasar Keterangan Saksi Verbalisan Akibat Pencabutan Keterangan Terdakwa di Persidangan dalam Perkara Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Brebes No 27/PID.SUS/2016/PN.BBS). Jurnal Hukum Acara, UNS, Solo, Vol. 7. No. 7

Putra Akbar Saleh. 2013. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Mengabaikan Bukti Keterangan Saksi Dalam Persidangan”. Lex Et Societatis. Volume I, No 1, 2003

Website

Soetanto Soepiadhy, Keadilan Hukum, Surat Kabar Surabaya Pagi, 28 Maret 2012.

Tahapan Prosedur Perkara Pidana, https://menuruthukum.com/2019/12/03/ tahapan-prosedur-perkara-pidana:text=Setelah%20melewati%20tahap%20 penyelidikan %2C%20 penyidikan, Negeri%20 untuk%20mengadili%20 suatu%20perkara.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-19

How to Cite

Rahman, F. ., Sunardi, S., & Arief, H. (2024). Status of the Verbalish Witness Recognition to Violence Against Suspects as a Tool of Evidence. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 4(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.53

Issue

Section

Copyright Notice

Most read articles by the same author(s)