Juridical Analysis Of Doctors' Responsibilities For Malpractic Action

Authors

  • M. Rizky Fernandez Malang Islamic University
  • Moh. Muhibbin Malang Islamic University
  • Hanafi Arief Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.97

Keywords:

Juridical Analysis; Doctor’s Responsibility; Malpractice.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the criminal liability of doctors who commit malpractice acts and to analyze the legal protection for patients who are victims of malpractice in positive law studies in Indonesia. This study uses normative legal research using three types of legal materials related to the responsibility of doctors for malpractice actions, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials, with the nature of qualitative descriptive research, types of normative juridical research, statutory and conceptual approaches.

The results of the study stated that malpractice is included in the realm of criminal law other than civil and administrative. Doctors can be prosecuted criminally, although the criminal law does not clearly stipulate criminal penalties for malpractice. However, several conventional articles in the Criminal Code implicitly mention provisions regarding malpractice that can be used as a basis for criminal charges.

In the Criminal Code, criminal liability for malpractice is contained in Article 90, Article 359, Article 360 ??paragraphs (1) and (2) and Article 361. Those subject to this article include doctors, midwives, medicine experts, who are experts in their work. each. If they ignore the regulations or requirements in their work, causing death (Article 359) or serious injury (Article 360), they will be punished more severely. Legal protection for victims of medical malpractice is regulated in Law no. 29 of 2009 concerning Medical Practice, granting rights to victims to submit complaints to the Chairman of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council, as well as simultaneously taking criminal and civil law remedies to court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Adami Chazawi, 2007, Malpraktik Kedokteran, Malang: Bayumedia

Ahmadi Sofyan (ed), 2005, Malpraktek Dan Resiko Medik Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka.

Danny Wiradharmairadharma, 1999, Penuntun Kuliah Kedokteran dan Hukum Kesehatan, Kedokteran, Jakarta: EGC.

Dewi Setyowati (ed), 2007, Batas Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Malpraktik Dokter Dalam Transaksi Terapeutik, Surabaya : Srikandi.

Huriawati Hartanto (ed), 2007, Dinamika Etika Dan Hukum Kedokteran Dalam Tantangan Zaman, Jakarta : EGC.

J. Guwandi, Dokter Pasien Dan Hukum, Jakarta : Balai Penerbit FKUI.

Kansil, 1991, Pengantar Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

M.Yusuf Hanafiah dan Amri Amir, 1999, Etika Kedokteran Dan Hukum Kesehatan, Jakarta: Kedokteran EGC.

Nonny Yogha Puspita (ed), 2006, Tanggugjawab Hukum Dan Sanksi Bagi Dokter, Jilid I, Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka, hlm. 71-72.

Oemar Seno Adji, 1991, Etika Profesional dan Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dokter : Profesi Dokter, Jakarta : Erlangga.

R.Soesilo, 2007, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, (Bogor: POLITEIA)

Syahrul Machmud, 2008, Penegakan Hukum Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter Yang Diduga Melakukan Medikal Malpraktek, Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju.

Sugandhi, 1981, KUHP dan Penjelasannya, Surabaya: Usaha Nasional

Legislation

Undang-Undang RI Nomer 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran, Kesindo Utama, Jakarta

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktek Kedokteran.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rumah Sakit.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28

How to Cite

Fernandez, M. R. ., Muhibbin, M. ., & Arief, H. (2024). Juridical Analysis Of Doctors’ Responsibilities For Malpractic Action. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 3(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.97

Issue

Section

Copyright Notice

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>